EARL OF TAINT

Well Now These Are Two Completely Different Situations Altogether

9 Comments Posted by Earl of Taint on March 4, 2017

In this case, a Republican president did not personally order a wiretapping, but became connected with those who did. He had to resign.

In this case, a Democratic president says he did not personally order a wiretapping – and cannot be connected to those who did because he says he wouldn’t do that ever. He got a $60 million book deal.

It’s like night and day, sure enough.

9 responses to “Well Now These Are Two Completely Different Situations Altogether”

Pingback: Two Completely Different Situations Altogether: Leading to the same criminal results |
Wingman March 4, 2017 at 5:29 pm
Well now bat ears can’t be impeached but he can still be hung for treason. Would that be a Washington or Chitcago wind chime?

Reply
jw burns March 4, 2017 at 6:05 pm
As Lloyd Christmas would say, “I loik it, I loik it uh loh”. Oh shit oh dear young Barry didn’t see this one coming. He got thowed right in that briar patch.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-04/obama-advisor-rhodes-wrong-president-can-order-wiretap-and-why-trump-may-have-last-l

Reply
Judi King March 5, 2017 at 6:17 am
As someone who remembers the Watergate fiasco, I find this to be a great point.

Reply
- Earl of Taint March 7, 2017 at 7:57 pm
  I was a teenager. It was hip to hate Nixon. I paid no attention to the details at the time. Busy chasing girls.
  
  Reply
an Ol ex Jarhead March 5, 2017 at 7:54 am
Are you saying the Press is crooked?

Reply
- Earl of Taint March 7, 2017 at 7:55 pm
  No broken.
  
  Reply
SafeSpace March 5, 2017 at 6:04 pm
The linked Zerohedge piece goes to some lengths to explain that IF Trump’s offices were legally tapped in December via a FISA court order, then some valid reason for issuing said order must have existed at the time. I fail to see how this gives Trump “the last laugh”. What was that valid reason?

Reply
- Earl of Taint March 7, 2017 at 7:52 pm
  Yes. We all need to see the original FISA request from last summer (it was denied) and the one granted in October. That valid reason may well be based on untruths set forth by fed attorneys. I don’t think it will hurt Trump in the least but we need to see them.
  
  Reply